Special Theme Edition on the Current Ukrainian Crisis: Volume 22, No. 3 (Summer 2014)
The East West Church & Ministry Report has issued a special theme edition examining the impact of the current Ukrainian crisis on the church and ministries in Ukraine and Russia.
This theme issue is now available in pdf format in English, Russian, and Ukrainian.
Read more about the East West Church & Ministry Report in English, Russian, or Ukrainian
Mark R. Elliott is editor of the East-West Church and Ministry Report, Asbury University, Wilmore, Kentucky.
Drug trafficking and profligate harvesting of antelope receive trenchant condemnation in Chingiz Aitmatov's 1986 novel, Plakha (The Scaffold). In one of the most notable literary landmarks of the glasnost era, the acclaimed Kyrghyz author lays bare late Soviet moral and environmental degradation. Out of character, censors let pass Aitmatov's pained airing of the abuse of drugs, alcohol, and nature and his protagonist's startling proposal of spiritual repentance as a remedy. Ex-seminarian Avdiy Kallistratov, has a muddled but high-minded notion of Christian sacrifice and redemption, as he naively implores dumbstruck drug dealers and game exploiters to foreswear their evil ways. For his troubles he ends up crucified on a Kazakh saxaul tree.
God-seeking Avdiy had no prayer of talking sense to drug and game profiteers. Equally improbable is the notion that a cure for Russia's current epidemic of substance abuse could come from churches, previously closed or marginalized for seven decades. Despite what one might expect, given limited church resources and expertise, church rehabilitation of alcoholics and drug abusers in the former Soviet Union is working far more effectively than either state or commercial rehab programs. Following an overview of the extent and consequences of alcohol abuse in the post-Soviet period, I will study focus on church-based alcohol rehabilitation and reasons for its relative success against formidable odds.
Russia today is facing a serious demographic crisis. Between 1993 and 2010 the country's population declined from 148.6 million to 141.9 million. With an excess of 12.5 million deaths over births in these years, the shortfall would have been even greater but for in-migration from Central Asia. Explanations have included deteriorating health care, an unhealthy diet, smoking, declining birth rates, emigration, economic upheaval, unemployment, and social instability contributing to disillusionment and fear for the future. The post-Soviet era has been aptly defined as one of "transition trauma," meaning economic and social dislocation sufficient to destabilize a nation. Many of the above factors have contributed to an ultimate cause of demographic crisis: a mortality rate so high it is unprecedented in a highly educated, industrialized nation in peacetime. A host of Russian and Western analysts, in turn, argue that alcohol abuse plays a leading role in Russia's unsustainably high mortality rate.
According to Alexander Nemtsov, one of Russia's leading specialists on alcohol abuse, consumption patterns in the Soviet Union underwent marked changes beginning in the 1950s. Alcohol purchases increased from 4.5 liters per adult in 1960, to 8.2 liters in 1970, to 10.5 liters in 1980—not to mention home-brewed samogon (moonshine), accounting for perhaps another 3 to 4 liters per person per year. In 2005, the most recent year for World Health Organization comparative figures, Russia's rate of consumption of pure alcohol per capita stood at 15.8 liters, the equivalent of slightly more than 75 half-liter bottles of vodka per person. For working-age men the figure equaled better than 155 bottles of vodka per year, or an average of three bottles per week. Europe has the world's highest rate of alcohol consumption, and in Europe Russia's consumption rate is exceeded only by Moldova, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. Russia's annual male alcohol consumption rate of 35.4 liters is exceeded only by Ukraine and Estonia.
Compounding the problem of increasing quantities of alcohol consumed has been the decreasing quality of spirits. Drinking often unsafe samogon has increased deaths from alcohol poisoning, as has the consumption of industrial alcohol, antifreeze, perfume, cleaning solutions, and other potentially lethal liquids. Whereas fewer than 1,500 Americans die from alcohol poisoning annually, the figure for Russia in a recent year was 23,000. Russia not only has one of the highest rates—if not the highest rate—of alcohol consumption worldwide, it also has the misfortune of a very high rate of consumption of strong spirits in particular: 63 percent in 2005, exceeded in Europe only by Bosnia which has a much lower rate of total consumption. A proclivity to binge drinking, the case for about one-third of Russian males at least monthly, heavy consumption apart from meals, and Russian cultural tolerance for heavy drinking further exacerbate the negative consequences of Russian alcohol consumption.
The unhealthy quantity, quality, and pattern of Russia's alcohol consumption provide the explanation for alcohol-related deaths of half a million Russians annually. Russia's high rate of consumption of vodka and other distilled spirits results in marked increases in alcohol-related homicide; suicide; traffic fatalities; drownings; fatalities from industrial accidents, fires, and falls; and terminal medical conditions including cancer of the mouth, cardiovascular, liver, kidney, and respiratory diseases, in addition to alcohol poisonings. As examples, 75 percent of murders committed in Russia and 42 percent of suicides occur under the influence of alcohol, and in one Russian urban investigation, 83 percent of those who died in fires, 63 percent who drowned, and 62 percent who fell to their death were inebriated. Thus, in the midst of Russia's demographic free fall, an increasing body of evidence suggests that alcohol-related deaths are especially to blame.
In addition to deaths, the social costs of Russian alcohol abuse include increased rates of theft, assault, rape, domestic violence, divorce, child neglect, and orphaned children. Misuse of alcohol is also responsible for fetal alcohol syndrome births and as much as a 15 to 30 percent loss in worker productivity through industrial accidents, decreased efficiency, tardiness, and absenteeism. Russian émigré Harvard scholar Boris Segal estimates economic losses from alcoholism at one-third of Russian GNP.
State and Commercial Treatments
The first of three especially common Soviet and post-Soviet treatments for alcoholism has been—and still is—drug aversion therapy which induces nausea and vomiting with alcohol consumption. Second is "coding" (kodirovanie), which employs the use of disulfiram, other alcohol aversion drugs, or placebos in connection with dire warnings of fatal consequences should an alcoholic imbibe before a specified "coded" period elapses. The third treatment, often employed in conjunction with the first two, is hypnosis.
In the glasnost era, from the mid-1980s, state-sponsored rehabilitation programs increasingly faced competition from new commercial, for-profit clinics. One web-based business directory includes 1,123 state and commercial rehab programs, but this figure very likely is conservative. New-wave practitioners negatively characterize traditional treatment methods as "Soviet," "totalitarian," "paternalistic," and "manipulative," in contrast to their own more "Western," and "democratic" approaches which are said to foster clients' "independence" and self-reliance.
For the most part, old-school narcologists (practitioners of traditional substance abuse treatments) have resisted Western psychotherapies in general and Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) in particular. Gorbachev broke a longstanding ban on AA in the Soviet Union, actually welcoming its emissaries as part of his anti-alcohol campaign (1985-88). These AA missionaries, as Professor Eugene Raikhel calls them, led to the founding of the first Russian AA groups in Moscow in 1987 and in Leningrad shortly after.
House of Hope outside St. Petersburg is perhaps the best-known residential 12-step alcohol treatment center in Russia. Founded in 1997 and largely funded by Louis Bantle, CEO of U.S. Tobacco and a recovering alcoholic himself, House of Hope has seen well over 1,500 residents complete its no-fee sobriety regimen. Graduates now participate in AA recovery maintenance groups in over 100 Russian cities. Today AA counts 370 Russian chapters with a membership of six to seven thousand. While AA growth in Russia has been steady, it pales before the dimensions of the country's alcohol abuse and in comparison with U.S. participation: 56,000 AA groups, 4,000 in Los Angeles alone.
In the former Soviet Union AA still meets with resistance, not only from establishment narcologists, but also from some Russian Orthodox clergy who consider it to be a religious cult or who distrust its Western origins. Nevertheless, Orthodox suspicions have lessened over the years, in part because in 1993 Patriarch Alexii II gave his formal blessing to AA. The earliest organized Orthodox effort at alcohol rehabilitation, Moscow's "Old World" outpatient alcohol counseling service, begun in 1992, utilizes AA's 12-step recovery program.
Any number of characteristics of Alcoholics Anonymous may be observed in Russia's subsequent church-sponsored residential rehabilitation centers: "the elevation of fellow-suffering experience over expertise," the understanding that recovery is not achieved by doctors, counselors, or the state, but ultimately by alcoholics themselves taking responsibility for their own self-destructive behavior, deliverance from addiction through the intervention of a "higher power," and insistence upon total abstinence. The vast majority of Russian church-sponsored alcohol treatment centers hold these understandings in common with AA, and most Orthodox and Evangelical Christian-Baptist treatment centers consciously implement AA-style 12-step programs. As for Pentecostal and charismatic rehab centers, some, like Kyiv's New Beginning Center, have been heavily influenced by AA while others are so insistently biblicist that they do not admit to the influence of AA, which can be quite secular in contexts such as Sweden and Iceland.
Church-Based Treatment: By the Numbers
What for the most part has been overlooked in the scholarly literature is the burgeoning phenomenon of church-based alcohol—and drug—rehabilitation programs: approximately 100 Russian Orthodox and some 600 to 800 Protestant. A Pentecostal church in Kyiv opened the first Protestant residential alcohol rehab center in the former Soviet Union in 1994, with the second, New Life, in St. Petersburg in 1995. The overwhelming majority of Protestant centers were founded after 1997. The charismatic New Life Center, in the Leningrad Region near the Estonian border, with a residential population that fluctuates between 169 and 400, may be the largest church-based program in Russia. Most church-sponsored rehab centers, however, are modest in size, typically working at any one time with 20 to 25 recovering alcoholics. Church-based programs vary in length from two to eighteen months, with an average duration of eight to nine months.
Common Characteristics of Church-Based Centers
Post-Soviet church-sponsored alcohol rehabilitation centers bear striking similarities, even though they almost always were launched through local initiatives, often with little or no knowledge of what others were doing. The great majority of Russian evangelical and Russian Orthodox alcohol recovery centers 1) operate on miniscule budgets, 2) in primitive, isolated facilities, 3) led and staffed predominantly by recovered alcoholics, 4) who insist upon spiritual transformation rather than professional medical intervention as the key to recovery, 5) with reported success rates higher than state or commercial programs. Surprisingly, daily regimens, rules, and recovery trajectories in centers thousands of miles apart appear to have been cut from the same mold: Most programs are highly structured, closely supervised affairs with detailed daily schedules calibrated to give maximum priority to spiritual disciplines, group therapy, and rehabilitative work.
Treatment: First Steps
The first step toward recovery for an alcoholic is a genuine desire for help and recognition of the need for "fundamental transformation." Without such an admission, even the best of programs are of no use. When alcoholics in Russia finally "hit rock bottom" and are desperate for help, they most often learn of church recovery programs through family or friends. Centers often have 24-hour emergency hotlines, while The Mill, an Orthodox rehab center outside St. Petersburg, hosts Tuesday afternoon teas in the city for applicants to gauge the seriousness of their desire to overcome their addiction.
Once alcoholics enter church rehab programs they undergo withdrawal without the aid of medical palliatives. Most centers, which cannot afford drug regimens, rely instead on "heavy dosages of Bible, prayer, confession, and fellowship." Christian rehab worker Alison Giblett credits, in particular, the "healing power of prayer" for sparing alcoholics withdrawal at its worst. Many program participants, for their part, report detoxification that proved "shorter, less intense, or non-existent" compared to previous withdrawals they had experienced.
Conversion, Confession, and Character Re-Formation
Recovering alcoholic residents and recovered alcoholic staff members shower new arrivals with prayers, personal attention, encouragement, advice, and expressions of concern. For the first several days new residents typically receive 24-hour monitoring by longer-term residents who affirm alcoholics, assuring them that they are worth the trouble, that they are persons of worth in God's eyes, and that the community is there, as much as possible, to prevent their relapse. "New residents," Alison Giblett notes, "are often taken aback by the welcome and love they receive on arrival; often for the first time they are meeting people who all have similar desperate stories and yet now seem full of joy and hope." "Most have very little understanding or belief in God, but they are offered prayer for their healing and invited to give God a try—to repent and follow him."
At the heart of Russian church-based rehabilitation is the conviction that only God can reform an alcoholic and that Bible study, prayer, worship, and Christian community are the practical spiritual conduits for rehabilitation. In evangelical terms, conversion involves calling upon Christ for forgiveness of sins and the forsaking of any idol, in this case alcohol, separating the penitent from God. In Orthodox terms, formal confession to a priest marks the alcoholic's intention to lead a new life. In The Mill, near St. Petersburg, "confession...bordering on unofficial requirement...leads many to confess for the first time in their life to Father Maxim." Anthropologist Jarrett Zigon relates from onsite observation, "Every one of the rehabilitants I spoke with has given confession at least once. Most of them said they were glad they did, for it helped to relieve them of many burdens." "Confession in the Orthodox view," Zigon explains, "is a necessary technique for the trajectory of morally remaking oneself. It is for this reason that private confession is introduced to rehabilitants at The Mill and emphasized, even if this emphasis falls on uncomfortable and fearful ears, as an important part of the rehabilitation process."
Along with conversion and confession, character re-formation is an essential component in church-sponsored recovery programs. Though the alcoholic has fallen, "the Church-run program emphasizes the inherent worth and sacredness of all persons as the foundation for moral transformation." Father Sergei in St. Petersburg impresses upon the addicted "the necessity of laboring and working to rebuild who one is." Means to that end are spiritual disciplines, including corporate worship, Bible study, prayer, fasting, lectures on faithful living, and group therapy.
The usual rehab routine involving exercise, regular hours, regular meals, and regular rest is naturally conducive to better health. Program participants regain appetites, regain weight and strength, and regain a sense of normalcy, in contrast to lives and bodies previously taxed by alcohol. As one rehab leader stated, residents need to discover "that it is good to have a structure in your life, that you wake up at the normal time, and that you eat at the normal time. That is something that they haven't been doing for years. We offer an environment where that structure and discipline can grow."
The daily routine of the rehab center reinforces the importance of spiritual transformation, work, and group therapy. Focus groups of rehab residents led by social work professor Ken Stoltzfus documented "daily schedules which included personal care, domestic responsibilities (including cooking and gardening), and spiritual/religious activities." As a rule, the routine involves set times for waking, sleeping, and recreation. The only significant variation in schedule from center to center seems to involve the number of daily hours of work. Typically, the larger and better established the center, the fewer hours devoted to work per day. In small, financially strapped programs, time devoted to labor can amount to half or more of each day.
Residents who successfully complete rehabilitation programs and make their way back into society face the danger of relapse unless they take great care. Just as important as the recovery program itself is the need for what Professor Eugene Raikhel refers to as "a new social setting" and what Professor Boris Segal means by "quality...aftercare." Rehab centers therefore encourage their graduates to steer clear of old drinking friends and old haunts and, instead, urge them to consider spending four to twelve months in halfway houses, transition apartments, and in the case of Orthodox, in monasteries, nunneries, or remote parishes. Centers also try to arrange employment, stress the importance of permanent vows of total abstinence, and encourage attendance at periodic reunions. Recovered alcoholics who have left The Mill and returned home to St. Petersburg have the option of weekly Sunday afternoon meetings at the Aleksandr Nevsky Lavra (monastery).
These two- to four-hour sessions provide opportunities for rehabilitants to renew friendships, make new friends, discuss problems, and encourage one another so that they will "feel as though they are not alone in the process" of staying sober. A large storage closet converted into a church on the second floor of St. Petersburg's Infectious Disease Hospital Number 10 provides Father Sergei a venue to care for recovered alcoholics and addicts through the Divine Liturgy, confession, and counseling.
In the case of Protestants, journalist William Yoder, visiting Baptist and Pentecostal churches in Siberia, reports a common sight: "rows of silent men between the ages of 20 and 50 unaccompanied by women or children." These are rehab residents and graduates. Moscow Pentecostal pastor and rehab director Andrei Blinkov has observed that former alcoholics who stay active in church are the rehab program graduates most likely to stay sober. Eugene Raikhel, rehab director Andrei Belozerov, and Alison Giblett all agree that church participation is a key component of successful aftercare. In the same vein, Orthodox rehab centers strive not only to see their residents free of addiction, but to see them realize "enchurchment" (votserkovleniia), to see those freed of addictions become true Orthodox believers. Conversely, in The Mill "it is very rare that anyone is able to gain true sobriety without having become enchurched."
Church Care and Church Growth
Churches are both organizing agents of recovery and products of rehab programs: Churches start rehab programs and rehab programs start churches. Churches not only start and support rehab centers, they provide safe transition environments for recovered alcoholics. Conversely, rehab graduates join and strengthen the ranks of churches or form the nucleus of new churches. Alison Giblett contends, "Drug and alcohol rehab ministry in Russia and Ukraine is the strongest determining factor of church growth."
In Tyumen in western Siberia academic Roman Poplavsky has also identified improved relations with local officials, even government special project grants, as byproducts of Pentecostal social work, including rehab programs. Nevertheless, Novosibirsk Baptist rehab director and pastor Andrei Belozerov insists that the goal of recovery programs should not be pragmatic, instrumentalist calculations to secure better relations with authorities, rehab clients' help in building churches, and church growth. Rather, the purpose should be "the spiritual value" provided to "the people served. Rehab is not 'in order to' but 'for the sake of.' Our priority is all people of all ages. Non-alcoholics and non-drug addicts need salvation just as much." Still, alongside compassion to alleviate human suffering, a desire for church growth has motivated many existing churches to become involved in alcohol rehabilitation. In the opposite direction, the charismatic rehab program Iskhod (Exodus), founded in Krasnodar in 2000, and now expanded to 70 centers in four countries, makes a point of opening new churches for its program graduates—25 in its first few years of operation.
Church Rehab Keys to Success
Four features of church-based alcohol rehabilitation programs in particular appear to have contributed to their success. 1. Their leaders and staff are themselves predominantly recovered alcoholics. 2. The programs are by design residential, rather than outpatient. 3. Their remote, isolated locations are far removed from destructive lifestyles and environs. 4. Finally, their finances are typically low-budget and are rarely encumbered by the outside control that comes with outside funding.
1. Ex-Alcoholic Leadership and Staff
Recovered alcoholics are nearly ubiquitous as directors and staff in church-based rehab centers. Time and time again, my interviews with directors and sponsors of programs across vast distances confirmed this point—from Khabarovsk to Novosibirsk to Almaty to Moscow to Kostroma. Fourteen of 20 rehab center directors interviewed by Alison Giblett were themselves graduates of recovery programs, as is the case with all 40 leaders of Evangelical Christian-Baptist Good Samaritan rehab centers. Rehab graduates who stay on to staff recovery centers work in various capacities as counselors, cooks, drivers, work supervisors, and transition home directors. Whatever their function, they all serve as role models: In The Mill, Father Maxim and his workers urge residents to look to Christ and the saints for lives to emulate, "but rehabilitants most often spoke about the staff members as examples of what they could become."
2. Residential Treatment
A second key to success has been the residential nature of recovery centers. The trouble with day programs, Alison Giblett argues, is that addicts "are still surrounded by all the same temptations." In contrast, in settings like The Mill, "separated space" provides "moral disciplining of a marginal population." Great value comes from community living, with staff and residents eating, sleeping, working, and worshiping together, all of which fosters a healthy lifestyle, one byproduct of which is sobriety.
3. Remote Treatment
Third, churches almost invariably locate their rehab programs in the remote countryside where temptations prove harder to indulge. Alison Giblett recalls, "It was often in the small 'family-run' isolated homes located far from the cities and modern life where I sensed the strongest commitment to change and joy in their transformed lives."
4. Low Budgets
As for income, very little, if any, derives from client fees or government funding. The Mill and post-Soviet branches of such transnational rehab programs as Teen Challenge and Betel have sometimes received overseas help with startup costs. However, to date, most church-based rehab centers have garnered little or no operating support from either the government or Christian sources abroad. That may be changing as Putin and Medvedev recognize the increasing threat that substance abuse poses for the nation. On 22 November 2012 the Russian Federal Drug Control Service announced funding of one billion rubles ($32.2 million) for 2013 in support of rehab centers, apparently including church-based programs.
The remarkable degree of self-sufficiency that characterizes most church-based rehab programs stems in good measure from a wide range of small business projects and farming. New Life near St. Petersburg, for example, derives income from residents employed in auto repair; carpentry; and sawmill, electrical, plumbing, and construction work. New Life also tends cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, and rabbits; operates a Gulf of Finland fishery; harvests and preserves fruits and berries; and grows and sells flowers and ornamental plants. The Mill, also near St. Petersburg, grows vegetables, raises cattle, sheep, chickens, and geese for meat and milk, and makes furniture for its own use and for sale.
Pastor Andrei Danilov's rehab center near Kostroma raises most of its own vegetables, secures meat and milk from its own livestock, and breeds bulls for sale. An Operation Mobilization rehab center near Novosibirsk runs a potato truck-farm operation to provide cash for program needs. As a final example, residents of Dorothy Murphy's three rehab centers in the vicinity of Almaty, Kazakhstan, cover their expenses through a taxi service, a guest house, brick-making, vegetable gardens, raising goats and rabbits, making and selling peanut butter, salsa, jams, and preserves, and marketing honey.
Rich Correll, a church-planting missionary working in Ukraine, has modeled his work with 34 Ukrainian rehab programs on the approach used by Betel rehab centers. This charismatic substance abuse ministry, which began in Spain, now operates 90 rehab programs in 55 countries—including four in Russia (starting in 2002), one in Ukraine (from 2008), and one in Kazakhstan (from 2012). Betel develops rehab centers that are financially independent by means of small business ventures, for example, through second-hand furniture repairs and sales.
Caveats in Calculating Success
Church-based alcohol rehabilitation programs in the former Soviet Union are unquestionably prolific and give every appearance of success. However, measuring the effectiveness of various rehab efforts, even defining what constitutes their success, proves to be a difficult enterprise. Still, in order to evaluate alcohol rehab centers, defining and measuring program outcomes is essential. Issues that complicate attempts to identify credible success rates for post-Soviet, church-based alcohol rehabilitation programs include lack of independent verification of statistics and lack of time and funds for rehab centers to underwrite follow-up of program graduates.
The degree to which centers maintain waiting lists and screen out poorly motivated applicants also clearly affects claimed success rates. Another challenge stems from the fact that since many church-based rehab programs work with drug users as well as alcoholics, procuring statistics for recovered alcoholics alone can be difficult. In addition, lack of agreement on what length of sobriety constitutes "success" and differing definitions for "rehabilitation," "remission," "improvement," and "success" also make for widely divergent estimations of effectiveness. "In Soviet times," Professor Raikhel notes, "a remission was considered effective if the patient didn't drink for two months," whereas today in church-based rehab programs, total abstinence for life is the yardstick for success.
At least one volunteer at The Mill, Sasha, holds to a middle ground in defining success. Permanent abstinence from alcohol or drugs certainly is the preferred goal of this Orthodox program, but few of those who complete its regimen remain substance-free for life. Nevertheless, Sasha sees value in the time its residents are alcohol- and drug-free, however short that may be: "Most of the people who come will return to the city and start using again. Everyone knows this. So more than anything, in my opinion, what is possible here is the chance to live a normal life, even if for only a few months." As anthropologist Jarrett Zigon understands Sasha, this volunteer means that "rehabilitation can be seen...as the possibility of living, even if for a very short period, some semblance of what might be called a normal life."
Anecdotal evidence from rehabilitants suggests a disparity between secular and church-based program success. A church-based program graduate in a focus group organized by Ken Stoltzfus shared: "A few times I went to the government hospital to clean up and of course it didn't serve any real purpose. Sometimes it was a day later, I was using again." Alison Giblett reports similar findings, citing the prior experience of men completing Christian rehab programs: One had been in a state narcology hospital 29 times, another, 11 times. The latter recalled, "I lay in the Army hospital academy for treatment. I was 'codified,' replaced all my blood, psychologist sessions, hypnosis, but nothing helped. "
Even though quantitative success rates are problematic for all the reasons previously cited, available figures do appear to have some value, at least in comparing state and commercial rehab programs with church-based centers. One of the most successful secular treatments has been a program developed by psychiatrist Evgénii Zubkov, employing group therapy in a controlled, rural environment, with reported success rates of 30 to 50 percent. A four-month waiting list helps bolster positive outcomes in this case. Researchers Boris Segal and Philip Fleming note sobriety rates in Russian secular programs in the neighborhood of 33 percent one year after discharge.
House of Hope, near St. Petersburg, with its Alcoholics Anonymous orientation, sees 30 percent of its graduates free of alcohol dependence, with Russian AA programs overall reporting 25 percent sobriety two years after participants have completed their 12-step regimen. By way of comparison, two U.S. AA surveys indicated sobriety rates of one or more years' duration for 50 to 69 percent of members. However, independent researchers have suggested a much more modest one-year AA success rate of 8 to 12 percent.
In the mid-1990s rehabilitants of St. Petersburg's famed Bekterev Institute succeeded in remaining substance-free in 5 to 17 percent of cases. Other sources give a state rehab success rate of three to five percent, while journalist William Yoder repeats claims of church rehab program directors that long-term success rates in secular programs are about two percent. Novosibirsk church rehab director Andrei Belozerov believes sobriety rates for state and commercial treatment regimens may even be as low as one percent one to two years out. Probably closest to the average success mark for secular alcohol rehab centers is the oft-repeated estimate of "less than 10 percent." Reflective of the poor showing of secular programs is the following recent admission of a narcologist with 50 years of experience: "I know how to get a man out of drunkenness, but to teach him how to live sober, I am powerless."
By way of contrast, quantitative estimates of success for church-based alcohol rehabilitation efforts in Russia and Ukraine range from 25 to 96 percent, again with the caveats that alcohol and drug statistics are often mixed, self-reported program effectiveness is problematic, and definitions of success vary wildly. Sixteen individual church-based alcohol and drug rehab centers have an average reported success rate of 62 percent. Nine additional sources, reporting on anywhere from 20 to hundreds of church-based rehab centers each, indicate success rates ranging from 40 to 80 percent, for an average of 60 percent. It would appear then that 61 percent would be the approximate average reported success rates for church-based rehab program graduates in the former Soviet Union. Thus, one may compare average state and commercial rehab success rates of "less than 10 percent" with average church-based success rates in the neighborhood of 61 percent. Since independently verifiable figures are so rare and definitions of success are so infinitely variable, it would be safest to state that church-based rehabilitation appears to be decidedly more effective than state and commercial recovery programs, but without basing that conclusion solely upon quantitative estimates of success and failure.
In comparing secular and church-based rehab treatments, perhaps more telling than purely quantitative measurements are non-quantitative assessments and evidences amenable to independent verification. Positive outcomes of church-based programs quite visible to outside observers include the aforementioned widespread employment of rehab graduates as treatment directors and staff, the prevalence of rehabilitants in new church leadership positions, and the frequency with which recovered alcoholics marry and raise families in churches connected to rehab programs. In addition, Kostroma city officials refer alcoholics to Pastor Danilov's rehab center. The director of one Russian church-based rehab center related the outcome of an unannounced visit by state officials and narcologists: "The police made certain no laws were being broken here and calmed down, but the doctor couldn't quieten down for a long time, having seen the change [in residents]...clearly visible to an onlooker: intelligent, bright eyes, genuine interest in everything, and confidence in their own strength." A medical doctor in Ukraine with nearly 30 years of employment in state rehab programs, made the same observation. Whereas she came to the painful conclusion that her past efforts had been "hopeless and senseless," she now volunteers in retirement in a successful church-based program: Kyiv's charismatic New Beginning Center sponsored by Sunday Adalaja's Embassy of God ministry.
Also in Ukraine, a joint commission of the state ministries of health, family and youth, and sport and leisure, after evaluating various drug and alcohol rehabilitation programs, designated the church-based "Know the Truth" curriculum used by the 80-member All-Ukrainian Christian Rehabilitation Centers Association (ACRCA) as one of four approved resources for substance-abuse treatment. In Russia an outside specialist judged the success of the church-based New Life Center near St. Petersburg "on a par with...the very best Russian centers for addiction treatment." In 2005 in a Kremlin ceremony President Putin awarded a medal to Sergey Matevosyan, director of this same center.
Church-Based Program Hindrances
Notwithstanding positive evaluations of church-based recovery programs, a comprehensive understanding of the movement requires examination of marginal and unsuccessful as well as successful efforts. Harassment by officials undermines the effectiveness of many church-based centers. Sergey Ryakhovsky, head of the Union of Christians of Evangelical Faith (Pentecostal) says church-based rehab centers function "despite, not in cooperation with, local authorities." In November 2010, on charges of forced detention, mistreatment and death of a client, and unsanitary conditions, the Ministry of Justice ordered the closure of the Protestant charity, "Transformation of Russia," which reportedly administered almost 400 rehab centers.
Some alcoholics enrolled in rehab centers sponsored by Protestant churches speak of their past failures in church-based, as well as state and commercial programs. The Russian Orthodox Church, for its part, appears to have been less aggressive to date than Protestants in addressing alcohol abuse. Whereas Patriarch Alexis II endorsed Alcoholics Anonymous, his successor, Patriarch Kyrill, has resurrected the charge that AA's "supreme being" is no substitute for the God of Christian faith. While some Orthodox churches host AA meetings, other especially conservative and nationalistic Orthodox are suspicious of AA because of its Western and Protestant roots. Also problematic is the estimation of a priest at Moscow's Danilovsky Monastery, who runs AA meetings for Orthodox clergy, that perhaps one quarter of all Orthodox priests are themselves battling alcoholism.
In addition, some Orthodox priests, for example, Father Maxim who directs a St. Petersburg rehab center, dismiss Protestant rehab programs as the replacement of one addiction for another: "They may be saving people from drugs, but these people display a dependency on the sect very similar to narcotic dependency." Similarly, Father Alexander (Novopashin) in Novosibirsk warns against "sectarian" rehab centers as "scams that hide behind good intentions." Therefore, he maintains, it is "very important in every diocese to have data centers or offices for sectarianism which would quickly disseminate information on the activities of sectarian and other scams allegedly involved in rehabilitation." It is true that successful church-based residential rehab programs—in Russia and elsewhere—rely heavily upon strict and demanding house rules. However, since spiritual disciplines and rigorous daily routines characterize Orthodox as much as Protestant rehab programs, both could be said to be fostering new dependencies—and, in fact, neither would care to disavow fostering dependence upon God. Conversely, on a positive note, Orthodox scholar Sergei Filatov of the Russian Academy of Science contends that Protestant rehab work in Siberia and the Russian Far East serves as a positive incentive for greater Orthodox efforts to aid alcoholics.
Unfortunately, misuse of funds can also be the case in church-based programs. A pastor in Central Asia formerly worked in an alcohol rehab center that "pretends to be a Christian group. They recruit new clients, invite U.S. sponsors, get money, and steal it. The leaders were buying new cars and houses and clients got nothing." Similarly, some ex-alcoholics serving as pastors of new churches spawned by rehab centers have suffered relapses, leaving their congregations in disarray.
Many church-based treatment centers must also cope with some combination of periodic budget shortfalls, staff shortages, staff conflicts, pressure to pay bribes, and crowded, primitive accommodations. Centers often sleep six to ten persons per room and lack modern utilities, forcing residents and staff to make do without running water, indoor bathrooms, washing machines, or central heating. Only two of thirty church-based rehab centers personally inspected by Alison Giblett between 2000 and 2009 had indoor toilets. Such dire conditions would hardly seem conducive to successful recovery, but in rural Russia at least, such rudimentary living conditions are not unusual.
Ted Mole, a professionally trained alcohol abuse counselor with 12 years of missionary experience in Ukraine and Siberia, plans to launch an alcohol rehab center for native peoples in Yakutia. Nevertheless, he harbors no illusions about the difficulties before him. Mole relates the account of one rehab program's collapse: "Well-meaning evangelical believers in Yakutsk...started a 12-step type program for alcoholics. After six months of work, the participants did not return and the vast majority of participants relapsed." Similarly, Father Georgi (Edelstein) has successfully assisted recovering alcoholics in his parish outside Kostroma, but other alcoholics have failed to make good on his help. On occasion this enterprising priest has offered recovering alcoholics housing in newly constructed cabins, with the promise of giving them their homes outright if they stay sober for a year. I remember arriving one morning in June 2004 in the village of Karabanovo to visit Father Georgi only to see smoke rising from the ashes of an izba that had burned overnight. An alcoholic under Father Georgi's tutelage had squandered his chance: In a drunken state he had smoked in bed, catching fire to his home. As anthropologist Catherine Wanner notes in detailing the successes of the Embassy of God's New Beginning Center in Kyiv, rehab program advocates "stress the number of individuals freed from addiction, not those who dropped out of the program." To date, a key question that remains unanswered looms large: How extensive are unreported instances of failure, in contrast to better-documented rehab successes?
Church Charity: No Longer "Obsolete"
Notwithstanding its hindrances and handicaps, the church-based alcohol rehabilitation movement in Russia and Ukraine constitutes perhaps the most ambitious social outreach undertaken by Protestants in the wake of the Soviet Union's demise. The present rehabilitation work of Protestant and Orthodox churches marks a dramatic departure from Soviet marginalization of religion. Michael Bourdeaux's chapter on "The Quality of Mercy" in his book, Gorbachev, Glasnost and the Gospel, was one of the earliest Western revelations of this stunning reversal of fortune for believers. With the advent of glasnost, the word miloserdie (charity) was no longer obsolete as it previously had been designated in Soviet dictionaries. Mikhail Gorbachev not only tolerated, he even publicly appealed to believers for assistance with the country's pressing social ills and moral free fall.
Church-Based Rehab and Civil Society
The church-based rehab movement may also be understood in the context of the reemergence of civil society in Russia and Ukraine. Volunteerism in support of the betterment of society has been seen as a concomitant of emerging democracies at least since Alexis DeTocqueville's 19th century Democracy in America. While Putin and Medvedev have decried Russia's alcohol abuse, they presently seem more intent on thwarting independent NGO initiatives than in facilitating the work of non-governmental rehab centers which, after all, are quintessential grassroots enterprises. Whether or not current state harassment and suppression of Russian secular NGOs will constrict the church-based rehab movement as well is an open question. Only time will tell if the November 2012 announcement of state funding for private rehab programs might portend a more favorable climate for at least this category of NGOs.
Church-Based Rehab: Indigenous and Independent
A striking feature of the church-based rehab movement in the former Soviet Union is the spontaneous character of its emergence without direction from, foreknowledge of, or approval from the state—or even church leaders for that matter. Pentecostals on the local level, who have launched the greatest number of church-based rehab programs, have undertaken the recovery of alcoholics without any appreciable Western influence, direction, or funding. What makes the essentially indigenous character of the post-Soviet Pentecostal (and Baptist) rehab story all the more remarkable is that church-based rehab centers first emerged in the 1990s in the very same years as the dramatic influx of overseas missionaries and their multi-faceted support for Russian Protestant endeavors. In the last decade of the twentieth century Western evangelicals had extensive, even overpowering, involvement in the reinvigoration of Slavic Protestantism. While Western missionaries and church emissaries took substantive roles in shaping post-Soviet Protestant evangelism, church planting, theological education, publishing, and ministry to children at risk, Protestant rehab centers have managed to proliferate mostly on their own with, initially, minimal involvement of Western Christians.
Church-Based Rehab: Growing Professionalism
From the start, most church-based alcohol rehab centers lacked almost everything needful except compassion and the moral conviction that every drunk was "somebody's brother," deserving a chance for reformation. Most church programs have made do without decent housing, decent funding, and professionally trained staff and resources. Today, buildings and budgets still lack much to be desired, but professional development is now increasingly in evidence.
In the United States, the Salvation Army's blending, over time, of "the traditional evangelical approach to alcoholism" and "medical, social, and psychiatric treatment" parallels trends toward greater professionalism in post-Soviet, church-based substance abuse rehab programs. Isolated rehab centers that typically germinated spontaneously across the vast expanse of the former Soviet Union have, in recent years, come to see the benefits of shared training, curricular resources, and networking through conferences, email, and Skype.
In 2001, the 80-member All-Ukrainian Christian Rehabilitation Centers Association (ACRCA) came into being, followed in 2007 by the formation of a Russian coalition of church-based rehab programs, the Center for Citizens Initiatives. The International Substance Abuse and Addiction Coalition (ISAAC), headquartered in England, provides rehab program training and resources worldwide, including the former Soviet Union. Printed rehab resources developed in the West and translated into Slavic languages, include AA literature, Campus Crusade's "Youth at the Crossroads," Teen Challenge curricula, ISAAC's "Life Continues," and materials prepared by British-based ASET. Instruction and training opportunities include a Youth With a Mission Addictive Behavior School in Kyiv, educational seminars conducted by the a Christian Counseling Center in Kyiv, OPORA (SUPPORT) training seminars on chemical dependency in Moscow, and alcohol and drug rehabilitation curricula offered by Moscow Theological Seminary of Evangelical Christians-Baptists and the Evangelical Christian Seminary (Moscow). In turn, the latter seminary reports ex-substance abusers as a growing component of its enrollment.
British citizen Alison Giblett, formerly an Izkhod staff member in Krasnodar now working for ISAAC, is the embodiment of the growing professionalism of the post-Soviet Christian rehab movement. Working in Russia and Ukraine in rehab ministry since 2000, she helped establish and then worked for the Ukrainian Christian Rehab Association. She participated in Russia's first national consultation on Christian rehab ministry, and she teaches an annual modular course in rehab ministry at the Moldovan College of Theology and Education. Giblett frequently attends and participates in regional conferences on rehab ministry in Russia, Ukraine, and Moldova. She also facilitates the introduction of Western rehab training programs including the British-originated "Light of the World" and the U.S.-originated "Genesis" rehab counseling programs and serves as a liaison between a host of Western ministries and post-Soviet rehab centers.
In addition to Protestant resources and conferences, the Russian Orthodox Church is increasing its efforts to combat alcoholism through education, training, and preventive measures. Overseeing and encouraging all such efforts is Valery Doronkin, head of the Coordinating Center for Combatting Alcoholism and Supporting Sobriety under the Synodal Department for Church Charity and Social Work. In September 2012 Doronkin taught a distance learning course for parish social workers on local church work with alcoholics. Archpriest Igor (Bachinin), head of the St. John the Baptist Sobriety Brotherhood, with its 70 parish temperance societies in 34 dioceses in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, led a webinar in November 2012 on parish temperance efforts. Since 2006 Father Pavel (Dorofeev) and rehab director and counselor Ekaterina Savina have taught substance abuse workshops and seminars at Moscow's Church of Tikhon Zadonsk. As another sampling of diverse Orthodox efforts, 21 Moscow parishes host five Alcoholics Anonymous groups, eight Narcotics Anonymous groups, two schools of sobriety, two residential rehab programs, various outpatient clinics and counseling centers, and celebrate liturgies and hold prayer services for substance abusers and their families.
Total abstinence, a consistent core principle of both Orthodox and Protestant rehab programs, is now being promoted by some Orthodox clerics for the church as a whole. At a roundtable conference on "Personal Sobriety," 25 May 2011, Metropolitan Kliment of Kaluga and Borovsk, maintained, "We need to revive the tradition of a lifestyle of abstinence." At the same gathering Archpriest Vladimir Sorokin from the St. Petersburg Theological Academy gave a report on "Personal Sobriety of the Clergy—The Basis for Sobriety in the Russian Orthodox Church."
What Is To Be Done?
Alcohol abuse inflicts widespread damage upon Russian society and upon the Russian economy. It seriously undermines the nation's health, safety, family integrity, and economic productivity. As a major contributor to Russia's demographic crisis, alcoholism also ultimately threatens Russia's strategic security, no more dramatically than in the case of a depopulating Siberia adjacent to China's burgeoning billion. Finally, as alcoholism increasingly erodes the foundation of Russia's social fabric, its demographic viability, and its strategic security, it poses, in turn, a threat to the nation's long-term political stability. The question remains: What is to be done?
In combatting alcoholism in Russia, government measures have proven ineffective in good measure because the public is little exercised by its own pandemic inebriation. "The difficulty," Alexander Nemtsov explains, "is that the alcohol problem in this large and heavily drinking country evokes almost no reflection in the national consciousness. Millions of personal tragedies attributable to drinking do not coalesce into a public sentiment against alcohol; heavy consumption has become a part of the daily life of a large section of the population. This sustains official indifference."
It is likely the case that no less than a sea change in Russian culture would be required to effectively rein in alcohol abuse. That, in turn, would be possible only as a result of a newfound respect for human life that has been cheapened by devastating revolutions, wars, and famines. Patriarch Kyrill has argued that "Freedom is truly possible only when society and every individual respects the God-given dignity of every other person." Similarly, on an individual level, lasting freedom from alcoholism requires a deep-rooted respect for one's own person, a belief church-based rehab advocates derive from St. Paul's admonition that the body deserves care because it is God's temple (I Corinthians 6: 19-20).
Before the 1917 Revolutions, an Orthodox priest addressed a national conference on alcohol abuse as follows: "Some say that drunkenness is a consequence of lack of civil rights, poverty, and hunger; others place it purely in relation to conditions of lifestyle....But, gentlemen, it is not for us to create paradise on earth. And we cannot ever find a place where the wind does not blow and sorrows have not reached man. And we will not abolish all the circumstances which could upset an emotionally unstable person." The only possible solution, he argued, was "an aroused religious consciousness" and the moral teachings of Tolstoy. Another conference delegate questioned the effectiveness of recreational diversions and education as antidotes to alcoholism. He pointed out that "education had not prevented the intelligentsia from heavy drinking, while the rigid moral code of the generally uneducated Old Believers and sectarians was effective in preventing drinking."
Church-Based Rehab Graduates as Models of a Healthier Life
In light of the long trajectory of Russian cultural history, it would appear highly unlikely that the Russian population would forego alcohol in favor of abstinence as practiced by some Old Believers and most Russian Protestants. Still, it might be plausible to imagine that out of self-interest the Russian state and the Russian public might come to better appreciate and make allowances for its various religious and ethnic minorities that either abstain from or better hold their liquor, including Old Believers, Protestants, and practicing Muslims and Jews. By some miracle, should that come to pass, sober graduates of church-based alcohol rehabilitation programs would stand ready as models for the nation of the possibility of a healthier existence free from enslavement to alcohol.
Mark R. Elliott is a retired professor of European and Russian history and the founding editor of the East-West Church and Ministry Report (1993-; www.eastwestreport.org), Asbury University, Wilmore, Kentucky.